Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Rumors

"Is the TTT school/legal world fraud coming to an end?

A "toilet-law" documentary, 2 posters doing doctorate/academic research of the law school statistical fraud and legal market crash, 'rumors' of the San Francisco DA investigating Contract/Temp Agencies, 1 lawyer jumping off the Empire State Building during the summer, a law student shooting up a law school, and someone mentioned talking w/ book publishers about doing a book about all this along with sending letters to 60-Minutes at CNN. Of course, not to be outdone by the Wall Street Journal Cover last month. Is the facade cracking? Will any change actually happen? If so, what?"


I want to hear more about the San Francisco D.A. investigation rumor. Where are the California Tom the Temps?

51 comments:

Anonymous said...

nope it won't go away, too much easy money, what may happen though is that they will do the same thing that American companies have done for years, just go overseas where the laws are more "relaxed" and the people are more desperate.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Why were all the proceeding posts removed?

Anonymous said...

I’m not even sure that it’s an easy money issue. Any case or matter that requires an army of doc reviewers is going to be complicated enough and involve enough money that the client is going to hire the best law firm they can. I think firms like that typically charge billable rates between $250 and $400 an hour for junior associates (i.e. 1st through 3rd years). No client is going to pay those sorts of rates for document coding. Instead, clients pays the firm $100 to 150 an hour for your time (which is around what a paralegal bills at), the firm pays the temp agency $60-80 an hour and the agency pays you guys $35 to $40 an hour plus overtime. It’s not like the excess $70 bucks an hour goes straight into the partner’s pockets; they have to pay all the overhead. Temp facilities may be crappy, but office space in Manhattan is still really expensive, especially in midtown. Coding software, computers, staff, ect. These aren’t huge expenses, but they probably eat up a quarter of what gets billed to the client. So at the end of the day, the partners only pocket about as much as the temps do, say $35 - 40 per hour billed. That’s not bad money, but it’s not like it’s a huge source of profit either.

The alternative would be for the firms to hire full time staff attorneys. But when you factor in recruitment costs, turnover and the whole issue of what to do once the project is over, you can see why firms rely on temps instead.

Anonymous said...

first of all who the hell wrote "60 minutes at CNN?" This automatically triggered the retard alert in my head. Then there was that BS line about someone shooting up a law school. That never happened. Some 1L decided to use his casebooks for target practice, but that is not the same thing. Stop making things up that never happened. Finally, every doc reviewer knows that they are billing us out at the same rate as first year associates which is 200-250 an hour. Partners bill themselves and senior associates our at 400+, but not 1st years. Do you even work in law? This is common knowledge in our TTT profession. Reading some of the stuff on here makes me wonder if you dont all suffer from severe mental problems.

Anonymous said...

Fuck you, you faggot ass mother-fucking temps. Go suck a direft hire's cock!

Anonymous said...

What happened to the crazy Hudson obessessed guy? Haven't heard from him on these comments in a little while- could he be the one responsible for all the comments here that got blocked by the administrator?

Anonymous said...

The administrator didn't remove the comments, the author did. The author must have wrote something that they regretted, flipped out, and slammed on the delete button 10 times.

Anonymous said...

Let's complain about how the new trend is to start short-term (i.e. one week) projects midweek so as to avoid paying any OT.

Anonymous said...

I heard that there was a bomb scare downtown (very close to the World Trade Center site) and they evacuated a big law firm but didn't tell the temps. The firm claimed they forgot to include the temps on the e-mail. If this had been real, many temps could have died. They treat us like cattle. It's total bs.

Anonymous said...

The more temps killed the better . . .

This website has only brought disrepute to the fucking queer-ass temp profession. Whatever.

Anonymous said...

5:49 - What's wrong little boy? Afraid you're not going to make partner? Wah Wah!

Anonymous said...

"The Loan n' Grant Song" (The Immigrant Song)

by Debt Zeppelin

Ahhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!! Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!

We come with loans, they're high priced, you know
from the toilet schools where your job prospects blow.
Take money from these clods
We'll sign their checks for new loans,
They'll learn the law, sobbing and crying:
Val-vol-line, I am enrolling!
In school we weep, our sprits marred,
Our only goal was to pass the wretched bar.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!! Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!
We come with loans, they're high priced, you know
from the toilet schools where your prospects blow.
You pre-Ls are so naive,
Our brochures can deceive you more,
Once we've got you inside the door,
We are your toilet lords.
You're in too deep, you've come too far,
Our only goal was for you pass that bar.

So now you'd better take stock and repay all your lo-ans,
For in leaving law, you can win the day
Despite of all your losing.

Oooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhh!!!!!
Oooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhh!!!!!
Oooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhh!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWB8jhxDmGI

Anonymous said...

Yoo-hoo! 10:12! I'm still here!

And Julie Zuckerberg and Allan Cohen from Hudson are still blacklisting people daily while piloting their slave vessel S.S. Temptanic straight into another shitty, inadequate doc review facility near you, 10:12. Near YOU!

(and you ain't gettin' on the project because YOU'RE BLACKLISTED, TOO! JUST LIKE THE REST OF US!!)

Anonymous said...

Just like every other Hudson project, the SS Temptanic will eventually hit troubled waters, pop a hole, and sink. You can count on Captain Zuckerburg throwing alot of bodies overboard, in the meantime.

Anonymous said...

Why are you surprised you didn't get the e-mail about the bomb scare? On the Temptanic, when things go astray, it's common practice to lock the slaves in steerage.

Anonymous said...

10:16!!

I am so glad you are still here. I got worried about you for a little there. You happen to be a rather funny and witty one- I did miss you.

Sorry to hear you haven't been able to get a job and that Hudson won't work with you. Maybe you can secure a nice assignment with one of the others. :)

Anonymous said...

Maybe with the others? And who would that be?

Scott Krowshitz and Dickhead Osman?

the evil stepford wives?

Carrie "Frankenstein lipstick" Cheskin?

I'm sorry, but all of these agencies are slimebags. Pray for the day when you can get out.

Anonymous said...

11:56, don't give up. There are still more agencies out there beyond the ones you've mentioned. Have a nice weekend!

Anonymous said...

I recently had a bout of compassion for Julie Zuckerberg and realized why she's such a bitch:

She hasn't gotten over having a last name that starts with "Z".

She was alwasy last in grammar school roll-call, always last in line.

And no one puts Julie Zuckerberg last!

She blamed her Daddy for this for awhile:

"Daddy! Why did you give me this Z last name? Why couldn't our last name be "Ackerberg" instead? Can I have a pony?"

"Julie, Princess - I'm so sorry. Don't worry - someday you'll have 100s of temps to take out the frustration on."

"Do you promise, Daddy?"

"Yes, sweetheart. I promise."

And Daddy Z ALWAYS keeps his promises to Julie.

Poor Julie. Do you have compassion for her now?

- Tune in next time when we uncover Allan Cohen's inner demons, as well as recount the story of how Dr. Frankenstein re-animated Carrie Cheskin from EP Dine after stealing the body from a burlesque show cemetery. We'll also find out how Quasimoto Shawn Treadwell was discovered at a circus sideshow.

Anonymous said...

It's Dr. Frankendine, not Dr. Frankenstein.

Dr. Frankendine had created many horrible monsters.

It created the worst of them this past June, when it organized the abomination that was called "THE QUINN EMANUEL PROJECT." Oh, the mere name alone makes one shudder.

Then, like an STD, Dr. Frankendine passed this cretin off to Lexolution. Rumor has it that Dickhead Osman and Scott Krowshitz are renaming their deformed, exploitative baby "HEXOLUTION."

Anonymous said...

Quinn was definitely the sweatshop project of the year.

I wonder what vile concoction Kroshitz, Dickhead Osman, Dr. Frankendine and that hag witch Nora are cooking up for '08. You can rest assured that Captain Zuckerburg's phantom ship, the SS Temptanic, will slam onto shore in a vain attempt to get a piece of some of the hellish action.

Anonymous said...

Yes - keeping a pony in a stable is expensive, so you can be sure Captain Zuckerberg will muscle all 5' of herself in there.

Anonymous said...

3:50, you are very much mistaken. Zuckerberg is about 5'7! Me and my buddies saw her a few weeks ago at 65 Broadway and from your description we thought we'd find a short person. Low and behold we see her, and she's TALL. You have the wrong person. And she's pretty fine looking too.

Anonymous said...

What was she doing at 65 Broadway? Inspecting all her slaves' teeth?

Anonymous said...

12:44, we are dying to hear the Dr. Frankendine/Carrie "Bride of Frankendine" Cheskin story.

Anonymous said...

I know Julie and Carrie - never had a problem with either. You're crazy! Both have always been nice. Dont like their bosses....

Anonymous said...

And who are their bosses?

Anonymous said...

Since most of you are in the field and have more information than I do maybe you guys can pass this on to Shawn Treadwell's boss. You are right when you say that he'll fuck you through the ass to make a couple of bucks. But what you don't know is that he pays for a piece of ass and when he's not doing that he's screwing his temps and his clients. How do you think he makes money off of you he sleeps with those big head honchos to make the good deals and then offers you the crap that is left over. He's a scum bag that is only out for himself. I'm surprised his bosses haven't figured out that the reason he's in the office on so late or on the weekend is because he's busy jerking off to porn or screwing one of his hookers bucause he's too cheap to pay for a room. And if anyone knows Shawn they'll know that he's a damn tight ass....please pass this on to anyone you know because he'll get you a job for a good fuck or blowjob whatever he's in te mood for that day. Not to mention that he's also ripping off Elaine Dine right under their noses. I'm telling you the man is only out for himself.

Anonymous said...

Hey 11:05 PM - you are both right and wrong. JZ is not short...she is indeed about 5'7". But to say she is "fine" is incorrect. Even with the knowledge that looks are subjective, and notwithstanding that one man's trash is another man's treasure, calling her fine is factually inaccurate.
I speak from a position of knowledge as I know her and have "known" her.
She is by no means unattractive, but she is by no stretch of the imagination fine.
In full disclosure, I am coming from a prejudiced position. After breaking up, Ms. Zuckerberg broke into my apartment. Stole my mp3 player. Called me a child molester for having dated someone younger before her. Threatened my life. And, best yet...had me arrested for stalking her over email for requesting my apartment keys back from her. Which she still has to this day and which means she can at least enter the building i live in at any time.
And dont get me wrong...i actually sorta liked her. regretted breaking up with her for the first week.
Now that I know what she is truly like, and the fucking lengths she would go to to get back at a guy who ended a relationship with her, I read a comment like yours calling her fine and it gets me riled up. All you doc reviewers that were victimized by zuckerberg, though entitled to feel the way you do, really have no idea what this woman is capable of. Worst relationship and breakup I have ever had and only hung out with her for a couple months. I am steamed! And potentially infected with an STD...will not know for certain until August. (and that is not libelous...Julie herself told me I should get an STD test)
So no more calling her fine or there will be hell to pay...by that i mean i will continue to ramble on and on on ancient blogs no one reads anymore! Let that be sufficient warning to all of you doc reviewers! Now i gotta go....its fourth of july and i want to go light firecrackers and throw them at the cranky old ladies that live in my neighborhood and never clean up their dog's crap.

Anonymous said...

Poster who had a brief bout of compassion for Julie Zuckerberg is a better man than I am. I have tried several times to have compassion. Especially given the fact that I had upset her a couple times to the point where she cried. But you know what, she is actually an ice cold, heartless human being. After our brief "romance" ended, and by romance I mean we slept together for a couple months ended, and she broke into my apartment, stole from me, ignored my requests to return my keys and my mp3 player and has them to this day and I was recently warned by the zuckerbergs civil attorney to stop posting things online.
This whole zuckerberg clan are something else.
I am headed towards litigation against julie, her father and their civil attorney so i cannot speak of the particulars. I will say here in this post that i categorically refuse to stop posting here, there, everywhere. On the interwebs, in blogs, etc. If you really want me to stop posting, you are asking me to give up my right to that right. I will do this for you. I will stop posting and blogging. Yes, for you I will give up this constitutional right. And I will stop the very second I receive the 10,000.00 check as consideration for the bargain. Until then, I am going to blog, and post, and write on the facebook walls, and twit, and whatever the hell else people do on the interwebs. now go away and leave me alone until you settle this shit out of court with me, serve me with process by August 31, or I will then serve you with a nice juicy complaint replete with causes of action that I have dispositive evidence for, and others where the evidence is more circumstantial in nature.
But a few interview with some of the document reviwers from Hudson and several depositions with Julie should tighten those CoA up. They will all at the very least survive a summary judgment motion.
So settle. sue. or get sued. but leave me the heck alone. Julie, I am sorry you got hurt. truly. i dont love you. i dont like you. you are a thief. and it is freakish how you kept my keys. and disturbing to me that you father and civil attorney do not recognize that that is both illegal and, more specifically and accurately, totally fucked up. I actually do have better things than blog. why not cut that check for 10k and have it messengered to me tomorrow and once i cash it, no more blogging. just ask julie for my address...it is the apartment into which she trespassed and stole and still has the keys for. if she thinks she is planning on making good on that threat on my life she made a few months ago, she will be sorely disappointed. I am unkillable by a middle-aged, early menopausal woman. It just cannot happen in this physical universe we occupy.and if you try to shoot me with a gun, you should know that i laugh at bullets. whether they are being stored in a cardboard box, or hurtling at my face at supersonic speed. The result is the same...I laugh. Like i am doing now at you and your clan and how none of yhou realize how insane you are being and how extreme you folks want to go over the end of a shitty 3 month fling. I know i am a catch and it sucks to have lost me, but carry on. plenty of fish in the sea....though the seas at middle age due to tend to get overfished.

David R Waldman said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
David R Waldman said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

ntroducing David Waldman, a temp attorney with a fake name of Anton. Maybe you'd like him to represent you in court?

Case Details - Charges
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court

Case # 2014NY033914

Say hello to your temp attorney 2014 blog commenter:

Defendant Waldman, David R

Charge Detail Disposition/Sentence
PL 240.30 1A
**TOP CHARGE** A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Harassment 2 - Threat
PL 240.26 01 Violation, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionHarassment 2nd- Phy Contact

Anonymous said...

David R Waldman
Case Details - Appearances
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court

Case #2014NY033914

Defendant Waldman, David Robert
04/30/2014
APAR3A Judge Dominguez, D
Domestic Violence Case

Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued

Anonymous said...

David R Waldman
Case Details - Appearances
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court

Case #2014NY033914

Defendant Waldman, David Robert
04/30/2014
APAR3A Judge Dominguez, D
Domestic Violence Case

Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued

Anonymous said...

David R Waldman
Case Details - Appearances
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court

Case #2014NY033914

Defendant Waldman, David Robert
04/30/2014
APAR3A Judge Dominguez, D
Domestic Violence Case

Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued

Anonymous said...

Look where David Waldman's abuse of women landed him. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGES. He enjoys using this old blog as a way to act out. Maybe you know him from law school?

David R Waldman
Case Details - Appearances
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court

Case #2014NY033914

Defendant Waldman, David Robert
04/30/2014
APAR3A Judge Dominguez, D
Domestic Violence Case

Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued

David R Waldman said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
David R Waldman said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Good morning folks!
On my break and since I quit smoking I use my breaks for constructive pursuits.
So, the psychotic poster refuses to help mitigate any damages.
So be it.
Julie, I was never charged with a crime.
And you still have not provided a shred of evidence against me regarding the abuse of women.
Your utter lack of accountability and your utter inability to not cast yourself as a whore and as a victim is, in my view, why you have so few friends, why you cannot sleep.
The deep seated resentments you carry around, now risen to new heights because of yours truly, could very well be the cause of many of your physical maladies.
Your mental deficiencies and resentments and baggage from the past manifests themselves with physcial ailments; precisely of the kind you suffer.
I was the one abused.
Your claim that I made sexual demands of you is baseless. I never even made a sexual request of you.
You made those.
You invited me to take you immediately upon entering your apartment and you also invited me to do anything I wanted with you sexually outside of what you termed scat.
Your horrific libel of my being a child molestor was based on the fact that I had slept with two women in their thirties prior to you.
You displayed an obsession over whether I saw you as someone of value or whether I saw you as a whore or too old.
I have the email exchanges which reflect this.
Your insecurity about feeling too old or unattractive vis a vis younger women I had been with, as well as the fact that you from the get go spoke ad nauseum of several of your exploits must have subcnsciously registered with you as possibly tending to position you as a friend with whom intimacy is involved as opposed to an exclusive, loving relationship you fraudulently and deceitfully proposed to me and kept up the farce for four months until I finally ended it.
Folly.
I assumed we were casual from the beginning and told you as much. Your posturing and histrionics and ultimate cheating on me, along with your ability to libel, steal, abuse, threaten, etc. and then accuse me of those very crimes, makes me think you possibly suffer from a mental disease of defect.
I have evidence of such prepared for trial.
Ask your attorney to show it to you when discovery commences.

Anonymous said...

DAVID R WALDMAN PLEADS GUILY
Last Appearance: 12/12/2014 --- Information updated
Part: D --- Information updated
Judge: Statsinger, Steven M --- Information updated
Calendar Section: Pending
Arraignment / Hearing Type: No Type --- Information updated
Court Reporter: Martinez, J --- Information updated
Outcome / Release Status: Pled Guilty & Sentence Imposed / Released on Recognizance --- Information updated

Next Appearance: 01/30/2015 --- Information updated
Part: D
Judge:
Calendar Section: Pending
Arraignment / Hearing Type: No Type
.Disposition/Sentence: Pled Guilty, Conditional Discharge 1 Year, Final Order Of Protection For 5 Years --- Information updated

Docket Sentence: Conditional Discharge 1 Years CVA Fee Imposed $25 DNA Fee Imposed $50 Final Order of Protection 5 Years Surcharge Imposed $175 --- Information updated

Charges:
PL 215.50 03 Crim Contempt-2nd:disobey Crt ** TOP CHARGE**
A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge

Anonymous said...

Criminal and domestic violence offender temp attorney David R Waldman is back in jail!

WALDMAN, DAVID
Booking Information Incarceration 06-MAR-2015
Book & Case Number: 3491502606
Current Housing Facility: MDC (Manhattan Detention Complex)
Arrest Date: 06-MAR-2015
Arrest Number: CRTDRT
Next Court Date: 09-MAR-2015
Bail Status: remanded

Anonymous said...

AVID WALDMAN IS DENIED BAIL!!! He's back in the jail for failing to meet court mandates after being convicted of domestic violence charges.

Last Appearance: 03/06/2015 --- Information updated
Part: C --- Information updated
Judge: Scherzer, A --- Information updated
Calendar Section: To Pay Surcharge --- Information updated
Arraignment / Hearing Type: Violation of Conditional Discharge --- Information updated
Court Reporter: Bent, M --- Information updated
Outcome / Release Status: Continued-to Pay Fine/sur/cvaf, Returned On Warrant / Remanded --- Information updated

Anonymous said...

Julie Zuckerberg said...
I feel so lucky I got out in 4 months. The rages he fell into around his jealousy, convinced I was cheating on him, the names he
called me! You see, I misunderstood. Apparently, I was supposed to be a perfect 10 for this man who was out of shape, balding,
unemployed since his arrest for the abuse-and at 45 has a testosterone level of 240 (that's more akin to an 80 something man). At
a size 0, he called me "chubby"! While he suffers gynocomastia, I OWED HIM perfect breasts. Because I did not deliver on these
sexist demands of physical perfection (for a smoker bellied faced 45 year old) I was of course cast as a whore. This all makes
sense, right? NO. This is verbal abuse looks like from a typical sad man who has no credit, no money, and his 75 yr old mom buys
his furniture because he's broke.
What's it like you do think to be that woman, As in the mother that raised my ex monster abuser? How can that woman look at her
son while knowing he has violent rape fancies of his exs, A history of assaulting poor Denise, And the others,,, so sad so many
lives he terrorized this David Waldaman, I hope to god his other victims have recovered and are again living, free, and happy!!!!
I'm talking the kind of abuse where besides calling you a whore and that you need to have a bald shaved pussy for him so he can
feel like he's with 12 year old girl. Or boy. So after I make my plan and leave this wonderful man... per the literature.. he
threatens to kill himself. Um, ok.. One safer woman out there!
Sadly, he didn't take his life after but he did lose his job, get arrested, and now has an open case in the criminal system that will
keep rocking for a year on those background checks companies to. SO NO JOB FOR YOU, ABUSER!!!!
Life works in mysterious ways. ::))
2:41 AM
POST A COMMENT

Anonymous, I somehow feel as if I know you. The real you. I wrote a sonnet in your name. It is called "Ode to Anonymous." Due to my limited vocabulary vis a vis bards and troubadours of yesteryear and learned men and women of today, the only word I know that rhymes with anonymous is "pus." But with you as my muse, I think you will find that I have romanticized both you and pus as much as humanly possible.
could you please finally explain to my readers why it is that you have not posted proof of my having been convicted of domestic violence let alone of even committing such an act?
Tell my readers, anonymously of course, the nature of the domestic violence
Dish out the details of my alleged violent rape fancies (sic) of ex's
Explain my alleged jealous rages in detail.
Provide something even vaguely credible that tends to show I asked you to shave any of your orange hair (i think your comment does evidence the truth. the truth of your having harbored some unhealthy aggression over an overhanded comment made to you several months prior to your comment in your eloquent post. I mentioned that prior to you, I had dated two women in their early 30s. I further mentioned that the trend for women in that demographic is to be completely shaven. And, I mentioned how sexy I thought it was. And I still think that way. That is the truth)
Keep in mind readers, I made these comments in a conversation. It was in response to hearing about julie zuckerberg's frequent trips to miami. it is where she goes to relax. and it is also where she goes to get drugs from and have sex with adam bair, an attorney in those parts. And who is in his 30s.

Anonymous said...

Apparently, it is only ok for julie zuckerberg to have sex with younger men while my doing so with younger women is evidence tending to support pederasty?????
i dated these two women. i liked these two women. julie zuckerberg does drugs and has NSA sex. And somehow i am cast as the bad guy.
though it is her right to have any opinions she wants about my physical appearance, I am not sensitive in this area and thus ambivalent about her having posted her opinions. I am curious as to why she was among the flatteringly sizable group of women who contacted me within 24 hours of my joining a dating site. curious as to why she fought off my first four breakup attempts, what with my being abusive, jealous, prone to pederasty, physically unappealing and all the other things that curiously never came to light until after i ended the relationship.
which was done for both of us, i might add. as my readers know, i value my friends. and all my issues with julie zuckerberg stemmed from the romantic, sexual aspects of the relationship. i was looking forward to a lifelong, genuine, close friendship with this woman. Despite her physical and verbal abuse. to me, that was wholly a part of the dating relationship. and in part, understandable. though far from abusive, i was certainly far from the prince on a white horse also.
she went in a totally different direction though. and apparently has continued to do so up until recently.
strange. especially given that she was not abused. and that i was. and was cheated on. and had my apartment creeped. and my mp3 player stolen. and had a lackey detective arrest me. twice. but over what is the question i have?
julie zuckerberg claims domestic violence. and she claims that i was in fact convicted of it.

Anonymous said...

if it is not true, i cannot think of a better example of libel. and it is not true.
my readers agree...i have been crazy not to have pursued criminal charges for the trespass, theft, abuse or the false reporting of an emergency. and which led to an estimated 42% of NYC's emergency response personnel unavailable for any real emergencies. they were busy climbing in my window, sitting on my couch, ringing my door bell, chatting with me in my kitchen, and otherwise indisposed. as there was no emergency, and julie zuckerberg knew it, to send all those good folks to hang out at my place was a no no. couple of them had some choice words for julie zuckerberg. all ended well though. i can be charming when i need to be. and love to talk. i held court with half a dozen of these folks for almost 45 minutes before duty called them away. and i say dont sweat the small stuff. and it is almost all small stuff. EMTs, police, jails and judges (heck, those were my wheelhouse a few years ago as a lawyer on the jersey shore) getting a beat down with a sneaker, having a music player stolen, being cheated on...all small stuff.
but the libel isnt. not online. not where friends have found it independently. not where it can affect my entire future. that is big stuff.
and all over a short relationship.
the lying is what exposes julie zuckerberg to liability.
she must have gotten greedy like so many of the bankers she onboards. the cheating, the abuse, the trespass and the theft...one would think that would have satiated the most ravenous of appetites for revenge. not with this one...this julie zuckerberg.
and all over a short relationship. that i didnt ask for. and was persuaded on four occasions not to end.
i would proffer that julie zuckerberg should spend less time relaxing in miami, on boarding deutshe bank bankers, exposing nebbishes to a STD, and pampering her two genetically engineered cats and endeavor to entreat upon google, via the powers the state and the judiciary are entrusted with in their fancy subpoena papers and high falutin court orderings and such, to take down the libel.
it will be so much better this way than the other way.
the other way is...the other way. (pirated that from michael clayton)

Anonymous said...

Julie Zuckerberg said...
I feel so lucky I got out in 4 months. The rages he fell into around his jealousy,
convinced I was cheating on him, the names he called me​ ! You see, I misunderstood.
Apparently, I was supposed to be a perfect 10 for this man who was out of shape,
balding, unemployed since his arrest for the abuse-and at 45 has a testosterone level
of 240 (that's more akin to an 80 something man). At a size 0, he called me
"chubby"! While he suffers gynocomastia, I OWED HIM perfect breasts. Because I did
not deliver on these sexist demands of physical perfection (for a smoker bellied faced
45 year old) I was of course cast as a whore. This all makes sense, right? NO. This is
verbal abuse looks like from a typical sad man who has no credit, no money, and his
75 yr old mom buys his furniture because he's broke.
What's it like you do think to be that woman, As in the mother that raised my ex
monster abuser? How can that woman look at her son while knowing he has violent
rape fancies of his exs, A history of assaulting poor Denise, And the others,,, so sad
so many lives he terrorized this David Waldaman, I hope to god his other victims
have recovered and are again living, free, and happy!!!!
I'm talking the kind of abuse where besides calling you a whore and that you need to
have a bald shaved pussy for him so he can feel like he's with 12 year old girl. Or
boy. So after I make my plan and leave this wonderful man... per the literature.. he
threatens to kill himself. Um, ok.. One safer woman out there!
Sadly, he didn't take his life after but he did lose his job, get arrested, and now has
an open case in the criminal system that will keep rocking for a year on those
background checks companies to. SO NO JOB FOR YOU, ABUSER!!!!
Life works in mysterious ways. ::))
2:41 AM
POST A COMMENT

Anonymous said...

Julie Zuckerberg. Bracha. An abusive post about me posted on a blog for victims of abuse. I had suspected that she found me to be a smoker bellied faced 45 year old and a loser because she contacted me the very day i joined match.com and it took her an entire hour upon meeting before she was on my lap with her tongue in my mouth and an unbearably long two hours more before she asked me to go home with her and sleep with her. My suspicions were confirmed when a couple weeks later she invited me to do anything with her sexually with the exception of scat. Who else but a smoker bellied faced 45 year old and a loser would be made to endure these affronts?
The tortures of the damned!! julie zuckerberg blogs about Low-T. something she knew only because of the blood test results I took when she asked me to be exclusive. Rude. Spiteful. Typical Zuckerberg. Sorta shortsighted of her too, though. For I in turn saw her blood test. And Julie Zuckerberg has a STD. And unlike my treated Low-T, her STD is with her for the long haul.

Anonymous said...

Never called julie zuckerberg, julie b zuckerberg, deutsche bank executive recruiter lead a whore. Never needed julie zuckerberg to have a "bald shaved pussy" for me. Not to feel like I was with a 12 year old girl. Or boy. Or for any reason for that matter. But the implication of pederasty is one that pervaded the short relationship. While 44 year old julie b zuckerberg can tell me all about 30ish year old miami lawyer adam bair that she does drugs with and has sex with during her frequent get aways to miami, when she hears my prior two gfs were 30 and 32, suddenly age gaps become an issue. she says the women must have daddy issues. this within a few weeks evolves somehow into my being an ageist, which in turn evolves into my being a pederast. though it is unpleasant to be accused of being a pederast by anyone, especially someone you thought cared about you and your feelings, it is even worse when this is alluded to on the internet. And while I will never forget nor forgive this and several other of julie b zuckerberg's abuses of me, I know that her preoccupation with ageism wrt sexual relations between people and her repeated accusations and allegations of pederasty originate from within her, borne of her childhood. In other words, though I am the subject of this disgusting implication, the object is julie zuckerberg herself. It is a her problem and not a me problem.
julie b zuckerberg is physically abusive. verbally abusive. she is a liar. she is a chronic gaslighter. she is narcissistic...in the literal sense. julie zuckerberg sees her psychiatrist of the last decade every saturday. i know the diagnoses of narcissism became axiomatic for this woman within the first or second session. zuckerberg can verbally abuse, physically abuse, disrespect and etc. and as soon as one responds angrily, they are immediately cast as an abuser whilst julie b zuckerberg is the perennial victim. concomitant with this is julie zuckerberg's inability to experience sympathy and her total lack of guilt or shame over the hurt and damage she causes. This is a great way to turn someone who would have brought comfort, support, understanding and happiness into her life into someone who no longer gives a shit. and julie zuckerberg will not stop there. she will obsess over harassing and hurting you way past the point of being comprehensible. that is a disturbing thing to be the focus of. it is mental illness up close and personal. and it is so foreign to you and you cannot, ever, understand how and why someone could do some of the things julie zuckerberg does that it literally scares you. you do not fear zuckerberg herself. or her spiteful blog posts. or her false allegations of domestic violence. you fear how someone who can often seem normal and loving can actually be evil. devoid of compassion. It is ironic in a way. Victims of abuse who then turn into abusers themselves and abuse the people who would otherwise be the most supportive and continue to do so to the point where one no longer cares that this abusive freak claims to have been abused as a child...which is horrible. And sorta...yeah, abusive. self-fulfilling prophecy. circle of life.

Anonymous said...

Julie Zuckerberg 

4/1/14




to me

For the record I don't want this. I wish you weren't jealous. I wish you felt how much I wanted you and no one else. How I wish you didn't have psych issues... I know it hurts. I'll be thinking about you and wishing you get over these issues. It's like wishing a blind man could see.

I love you more than you know.


This email was sent to me the day I broke up with Julie Zuckerberg. It illustrates that julie zuckerberg has a terrible memory...for the truth anyway. And while I would never threaten suicide to anyone, for any reason, ever, I still find julie b zuckerberg, executive recruiter, deutsche bank, new york, 's allegation to be horrifically offensive. You will too when you learn that julie b zuckerberg already has an ex boyfriend that died either through accidental overdose or by suicide. this was one of julie zuckerberg's few serious boyfriends. julie zuckerberg calls him "dead chris." i never liked her use of that term, but there is a certain cold logic to it I suppose. This fellow and julie zuckerberg were at one time planning on spending the rest of their lives together. until they werent, that is. but still, someone like that dies of what was most likely a suicide and julie zuckerberg can publicly post on blogs the accusation that i threatened suicide, totally untrue mind you (and most likely posted to...for...because...heck, i actually have no idea. crazy ex is as crazy ex does)and go even further and state that she regrets that i did not commit suicide. one suicide in her life is apparently at least one too few. i am secretly flattered though...from love to a sincere desire for me to die. i am thankful that i am able to arouse such passions in women. Means I am doing something right. Or wrong. But at least I am out there in life doing!