"The high thrilling song of the Sirens will transfix him, lolling in their meadow, round them heaps of corpses rotting away, rags of skin shriveling on their bones ... Race straight past that coast!"
-Homer, The Odyssey (Book 12)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Tom,
Just be thankful that only your financial and professional well being were harmed by these sweet sounding Sirens. I had the unfortunate chance to date one of these pea-brained, prada wearing, plastic phonies. Despite some initial misgivings, I hesitatingly sailed into port, and succumbed to one of their sweet sounding, soothing songs. Paralyzed by the hymns of "I love you," and "Be with you forever," I totally discarded any notion of common sense, and was completely oblivious to the fact that my Siren was fucking another sailor - a sailor who had a gf by the way!
Now cognizant of the truth, I confronted my Siren who denied the obvious, and enchanted me with yet another tearful swan song. She did this again and again, just as she was probably contemporaneously doing a hundred other sailors, again and again. Now with emotions and self-esteem in tatters, I sail off this island with the knowledge that the same underhanded techniques, plastic smiles, and phoniness that can be used to rob you of your self-worth and manhood are the same techniques that can be used to rob you out of your paycheck. Heads up for the Sirens!
My Blog List
-
-
What Happened to JD Underground (JDU)?5 years ago
-
Thank You and Take Care6 years ago
-
-
Is a Bad Boy a Bad Guy?9 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2009 Beastly Behavior Award: Richard "Massasar" Matasar, "The Subprime Student Lending Pimp Dean"
2008 Beastly Behavior Award: David Perla, "The Outsourcer"
2007 Beastly Behavior Award: Joan King, "The Law School Administrator"
2006 Beastly Behavior Award: Alfred Youngwood, "The Sweatshop Overseer"
80 comments:
Okay, just to clarify - You banged a)Kristy from Update, b) Debbie from Update, c) Leslie from Update, d)Christina (not to be confused with Kristy) from Update?
*If it was in fact, the lovely Eileen herself from Update, you get bonus points.
God, I love this industry.
E) NONE OF THE ABOVE.
You people are so NY centric. There is actually life outside of NYC.
right...like any self-respecting recruiter would ever sink so low as to date temp attorney...LOL!
I doubt the person writing in was a temp attorney. It doesn't even sound as if he was an attorney. He probably stumbled across the blog and said, "Oh, so they screw the temps they hire, too!!!!"
By the way, I'm not from New York City but I totally get what you're saying.
What the fuck? Is this now a dating and romance blog?
Uncle Tom's use of allegory is well over my head.
He used to just say what we should be watchful for.
Now, we're supposed to remember high school freshman ?classics?. We read the Iliad and the Odyssey, but let's get back to contract attorneys and draw from his wisdom in a more succint, direct, helpful way. Some of us went the political route and not the liberal arts route in college and in our careers, so now in doc review tales veiled in what the English majors know so well are lost on we former legislators. The commentors are often just high-fivers, I generally don't trust the commentors as far as I can spit, for useful tips.
And I can't spit very far.
Tom, it's your blog and I/we appreciate your past kindnesses. The archives are helpful. But I'm beginning to subscribe to what I've been reading in comments over the summer, with no disrespect intended: You're less and less direct and helpful. If The Sirens has anything to warn me about a firm or agency it's lost on me. If you are working hard, you're steering further from how you used to help us, and I, too, miss your helpful postings. The previous post for cereal was a waste, too. What's a white horse tavern: A reference to the place that sells small hamburgers? White Castle or something?
Whatever. It's your blog, if you enjoy it that's what counts.
I like "The Sirens" article. Whether it is true or not, it is an amusing, classic piece of writing and it speaks volumes about Update Legal.
In case the people who read this blog don't know by now, it is about the legal temp world in NYC, so of course it is NY centric. And if the previous poster thinks that "Special K" is about cereal, then I don't even know how he was able to find this blog in the first place. Keep the funny anecdotes coming. We need to lighten up as well as to provide useful information about the doc review world in NYC.
it still is amazing that after all this time the blog has been up and temp atty work has been out, there are still some people who don't get that when you get canned from a project- or asked not to return like the person with the bar, it's because the FIRM doesnt want you.
To the person who was no longer wanted after the bar:The agencies want placements! If they don't have placements, they don't make their huge cash. Could be the firm doesn't have a legit reason to dump you, but you must have screwed something up for them or the agency would keep you there and suck money off you. I know a temp who returned after her bar no problem to that big project so you probably weren't liked by your firm.
that's how it is here in DC, too.
"If The Sirens has anything to warn me about a firm or agency it's lost on me." - I agree. This sort of stuff is lost on me and probably 90% of the lawyers reading this blog.
I like horror stories, and I like naming names. If there are evil law firm employees to be named, they should be called out for a smackdown.
People from one group of the project were allowed to return to the project after the bar, while people working with another group were not. Let's be honest - the project is mostly run by staff attorneys who all have their heads up their asses. The one Hughes Hubbard and Reed attorney on the project, Harris Berenson (listed on the HHR website as "eDiscovery Counsel"), is hardly ever here, and when he is, he is usually looking for a way to make someone miserable so that he can feel better about his title as eDiscovery Counsel. (If someone knows exactly what that title means, please feel free to explain.) The one who picks and chooses who should stay and who should be replaced by new people on the project is Hudson's own Patrick McLaughlin, the front desk weasel who spends most of his time making phone calls to his boyfriends and yelling at people for minor issues. I'm not quite sure how he gets his jollies anymore since he can't yell at people for coming back late from lunch since there is no longer a maximum amount of time that you can take for your break. If the firm actually cared about people's work/behavior on the project, most people here would have been fired long ago...
It's the same ol' same 'ol... you people are so lame. You blame the agency or their employees when you don't like your project. You can always leave if you don't like the firm or the agencies. And if you are so great and so much better than the Hughes e-discovery attorney guy, im sure you will have no problem securing your own perm job, right? And to those righteous temps who weren't wanted back after the bar- Im sure they will get more work asap bc they were so great but -sniffles- their greatness wasn't recognized by the firm. The only thing worse than a disgruntled temp, is a fired now unemployed disgrunteled temp.
To 10:09PM:
I used to work in that hell hole and Patrick from Hudson doesn't chose who to replace he does what the firm staff attorneys wants him to like a string puppet. I guess this is another person who doesnt understand the firm and agency scheme. I work in dc now sometimes and it's the same thing with our bigger projects. All puppets they are everywhre.
Jeez! Wasnt this supposed to be about the Sirens and Update girls alledgedly fucking temps?
Does anyone know if this is true? If so, I'm going to go register there tomorrrow and get some real employee benefits. I don't have that much doc review experience though so do you think I will still have a chance with them? I would appreciate anyone's input here. Thank you.
11:58, We're attorneys so as second in the food chain we have sex with everyone under us except doctors. No one can tell the allegory is meant to be Update from Tom's original posting.
If that's what it is, see "Risky Business," where Tom Cruise says, "When in doubt, f**k." I've gone out with the a few secretary/recruiters from agencies. They are fresh out of college and ripe for the picking.
If people were not returned to a project who cares! People were not accepted for the project for arbitrary reasons. As a minority the racial tension down here in DC is palpable on projects. Sisters worrying about their 40 and a mule. Crazy stuff that makes you doubt they ever went to law school. I would not accept such (non-slang) freaks for a project in the first place either, and use any excuse to keep them the heck away.
Thanks to the poster who reiterated my request to TTT: Please continue your kind warnings to us and cut down on the ridiculous allegories. Cereal is for children: Haven't had it since middle school. As I wrote, it's your blog, but you used to keep us in mind, and you are leaving us behind. I can only imagine our third-tier second class have who are silent because they don't have a clue, just like at work!
7:33AM: If you read this blog a lot, you should know who "pea-brained, prada wearing, plastic phonies" refers to in the original article. I am sure that anybody who has dealt with Update even just one time identified the subject of that article right away.
And if you don't know that "Special K" refers to Sullivan & Cromwell, then again you are not an experienced temp. Not everything needs to be spelled out; sometimes it's fun to read between the lines. This blog is for the NY doc review niche of the legal world. It is not meant to be understood or appreciated by everyone.
I think ever NY temp has passed by the hell hole that is 65 Broadway. I was RELIEVED to be let go from that project (months ago and be able to get a real job). It is the worst job I have ever had and that includes working at the mall as a teen. When I was there the way Hudson got away with firing the people studying for the bar was by actually making them resign that way they also don't have to pay unemployment (they get you both coming and going). If that's the way they still do things in those that were told not to return this time around should have had no expectation of returning since they quit. Not surprising since the majority of people ther are dirty (the bathroom made me dry heave everytime), stupid (yes,the majority would not understand TTT's allegory)and most of all hypocrites. As for greatness any self-aware person who is temping hopefully has a more realistic sense of their situation and why they are temping. It is very easy to be a self-righteous prig when you are not paying a Manhattan rent on your own and have student loans to pay as well.
I'm reading this blog for like the first time and I can't believe what's on here. If you can't get a job after law school, it's the law school's fault because they misrepresented their post school employment statistics, if you knowingly pay a high tuition to go to law school it's their fault you enrolled and paid anyway. And Sallie Mae are bad they want their money back and aren't compassionate to your mistake of going to law school.
if you can't find a perm job after law school and take a temp job and you hate it, it's BOTH the firm's fault AND agencies fault that provided you with the opportunity to pay back Sallie Mae who provided you with the funds to pay off the high tuition law school that misrepresented your chanses for employment.
Does anyone in NYC take responsibilty for their actions and choices????
Get off this board you idiot and go back to dating your cousin. You have no idea what you are talking about.
take responsibility? A school lies about its employment stats and starting salaries as a way to induce you to going to that school. If a publicly traded company did that, the corporate officers would be in jail, think Enron. Where is the responsibility for the malfeaseance and fraud commited by the law school?
Sheeesh, if you can't even get that concept you REALLY should avoid law school because you WILL finish last in your class and not have a job.
so when you are done with law school and take a temp job that you hate, is it a. the law school's fault? b. the firm's fault? c. the agency's fault?
It's no one's fault. I think that most of us accept the consequences that resulted from the choices that we made. No one is blaming the firms or the agencies for the situation that we find ourselves in, but is it too much to ask that they treat us with respect and don't subject us to sub-human work conditions?
2:01, I totally disagree. Maybe you accept the consequences of your choices, but the overwhelming majority of people posting on this blog do not. They blame everyone but themselves. It seems like the only working conditions that you guys wouldn't describe as "sub-human" would be if you were given the nice office (which actually isn't that nice) and the $160k salary that everyone here seems to say they were promised by their law school. Well, guess what? You don't deserve that job simply because you have a JD. You deserve that job because you worked hard in law school AND got good grades. It's that simple. It's not racism or nepotism or anything else. Stop whining so goddamn much. Take a real job as a lawyer, even one that doesn't pay well, work hard and see what happens.
Well said man. Lots of people do not accept personal responsibility. Same here in DC and LA. Just started a gig with a NY firm called Solomon Page here in DC. They give us lunch, dinner, 7am - 10pm window Mon-Fri, free photocopying and International phone calls. It's my first $40/hour, $60 OT (unlimited hours, 50 min) project, and aside from keeping us closely supervised the work is easy and I like my cool desk in someone else's air-conditioned office. Just got done with a big DC firm Arnold and Porter for a year at $35, steady work but in a document review warehouse. Props to our NYC friends and their basements, glad we don't see much of that!
Soon these blame-everyone-in-the-legal-world-except-yourself-types will be asking for reparations!
I mean, REALLY- if agenices and temp atty jobs didn't exist, what WOULD you be doing to earn money while looking for a perm job????
Maybe one of them blame everyone types that that moron who made the Enron comaparison will answer. (if law school actions did rise to the level of Enron shouldn't you be contacting the Atty General's office to get on those fraud charges instead of typing on a blog?) Heh. Heh. Heh.
Again very well said. Tom is very kind to permit the ridiculous hyperbole we read here from 20's and 30's adolescents.
Oh so well said! Lets keep all the labor cheap, cheap, cheap. Bring the Pinkertons in to show these attorneys how lucky they really are to even have work.
Tom is so kind to permit ridiculous hyperbole from the above "real lawyers" trolling the site.
It seems like the only working conditions that you guys wouldn't describe as "sub-human" would be if you were given the nice office (which actually isn't that nice) and the $160k salary that everyone here seems to say they were promised by their law school. Well, guess what? You deserve that job because you worked hard in law school AND got good grades. It's that simple. It's not racism or nepotism or anything else. Stop whining so goddamn much. Take a real job as a lawyer, even one that doesn't pay well, work hard and see what happens.
Two words for you: Fuck and YOU.
I graduated in the top of my class and worked very hard. I feel I should have ended up with better than what I "deserved" -- a temp job that pays $25/hr, no benefits, no PTO, and is just that. Temporary.
You are either a white man or a stupid white woman with connections who has NO idea what the legal profession is really like because YOU ended up getting a decent job and don't have to stay awake at night wondering where your next paycheck is going to come from. As for you remark to take a "real" job as a lawyer, I'm sure 99% of the people on this board would IF they could get one!
Stupid ASSHAT. I just hope you never end up in the shape we're all in someday. Then you'll see what it's like...
Of course, Uncle Tom: No top law firm wants blacks or women. Sad but true. Get over it and park my car. Then finish coding our docs. Stop eye-balling me, boy.
Why do minorities feel so entitled! We use toilet paper for pieces of shit, why should law firms be any different.
To 11:44PM:
If you graduated at the top of your class and couldn't land a decent job, it's because of your piss poor interviewing skills which probably showcased that terribele attitude of yours. Almost all grads who finished top of their class get opportunities- if one didn't stick, it's most likely because your personality blows the big one. Which it clearly does. Good luck!
No, you're still wrong. It's because I have a decent job that I do know what the legal profession is about. In case you haven't noticed, the number of recent grads has stayed pretty constant for years while the size of firms has ballooned. There are plenty of opportunities out there for someone willing to take them. Color has nothing to do with it. But all of you guys would rather spend your time here bitching about how the world owes you and how horrible the people running the doc reviews are. Get over it and get over yourselves.
Graduating "in" the top of your class is not the same as graduating "at" the top of your class. If you meant that you graduated at the top of your class, then I agree with 11:29. You probably come across in your interviews with the same attitude you do here, i.e., "you white devil, you owe me this job." Pretty easy to see why the offers didn't come. If you graduated in the top of your class, well, that's a completely meaningless statement. For all I know, you graduated in the top half of your class. If you went to one of the area's lower-ranked schools, I think even you would agree that that's not particularly impressive.
Anton Phillipe Wolfgang Van Sertima said...
The preceding post was posted by David Waldman; deletion pending
ntroducing David Waldman, a temp attorney with a fake name of Anton. Maybe you'd like him to represent you in court?
Case Details - Charges
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court
Case # 2014NY033914
Say hello to your temp attorney 2014 blog commenter:
Defendant Waldman, David R
Charge Detail Disposition/Sentence
PL 240.30 1A
**TOP CHARGE** A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Harassment 2 - Threat
PL 240.26 01 Violation, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionHarassment 2nd- Phy Contact
Introducing David Waldman, a temp attorney with a fake name of Anton. Maybe you'd like him to represent you in court?
Case Details - Charges
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court
Case # 2014NY033914
Say hello to your temp attorney 2014 blog commenter:
Defendant Waldman, David R
Charge Detail Disposition/Sentence
PL 240.30 1A
**TOP CHARGE** A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Harassment 2 - Threat
PL 240.26 01 Violation, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionHarassment 2nd- Phy Contact
Introducing David Waldman, a temp attorney with a fake name of Anton. Maybe you'd like him to represent you in court?
Case Details - Charges
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court
Case # 2014NY033914
Say hello to your temp attorney 2014 blog commenter:
Defendant Waldman, David R
Charge Detail Disposition/Sentence
PL 240.30 1A
**TOP CHARGE** A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Harassment 2 - Threat
PL 240.26 01 Violation, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionHarassment 2nd- Phy Contact
Introducing David Waldman, a temp attorney with a fake name of Anton. Maybe you'd like him to represent you in court?
Case Details - Charges
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court
Case # 2014NY033914
Say hello to your temp attorney 2014 blog commenter:
Defendant Waldman, David R
Charge Detail Disposition/Sentence
PL 240.30 1A
**TOP CHARGE** A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Harassment 2 - Threat
PL 240.26 01 Violation, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionHarassment 2nd- Phy Contact
David R Waldman
Case Details - Appearances
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court
Case #2014NY033914
Defendant Waldman, David Robert
04/30/2014
APAR3A Judge Dominguez, D
Domestic Violence Case
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Look where David Waldman's abuse of women landed him. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGES. He enjoys using this old blog as a way to act out. Maybe you know him from law school?
David R Waldman
Case Details - Appearances
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court
Case #2014NY033914
Defendant Waldman, David Robert
04/30/2014
APAR3A Judge Dominguez, D
Domestic Violence Case
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
New York State Unified Court System
Courts WebCrims
Close
Case Details
Case Details
Summary
Appearances
Charges
Motions
Case Details - Appearances
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court
Case # 2014NY033914
Defendant Waldman, David R
Date/
Part Judge Calendar
Section Arraignment/
Hearing Type Court
Reporter Outcome/
Release Status
07/14/2015
D ACD No Type
07/15/2014
D Statsinger, Steven M PENDING No Type Abbate, A
Adjourned - Cpl Section 170.55
05/23/2014
D Statsinger, Steven M PENDING No Type Thimbrel,
Case Continued (adjourned)
RoR Continued
04/30/2014
APAR3A Dominguez, D PENDING Domestic Violence Case Mcneill, D
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Released on Recognizance
Back to top
Courts Email: eCourts@courts.state.ny.us
Case Details
Summary
Appearances
Charges
Motions
Inmate Details
WALDMAN, DAVID
NYSID: 12659887R
Booking Information
Incarceration 10-DEC-2014
Book & Case Number:
3491416626
Current Housing Facility:
MDC (Manhattan Detention Complex)
Arrest Date:
09-DEC-2014
Arrest Number:
m14705669l
Next Court Date:
12-DEC-2014
Bail and/or Bond:
$1,500.00 bail or $3,000.00 bond
Charge Information
Docket:Indictment:Court Part:Court Name:
Charge:
2014NY091426 00000 0000 D Manhattan Crim. Ct.
215.50 MA (CRIMINAL CONTEMP- 2ND A Misdemeanor)
David R Waldman
Year of Birth: 1968
Sex:Male
Race: White
Height: 5 ft 9 inches
Weight:172 lbs
Hair Color:Brown
Eye Color: Hazel
Nativity: New Jersey
David R Waldman plead guilty
Last Appearance: 12/12/2014 --- Information updated
Part: D --- Information updated
Judge: Statsinger, Steven M --- Information updated
Calendar Section: Pending
Arraignment / Hearing Type: No Type --- Information updated
Court Reporter: Martinez, J --- Information updated
Outcome / Release Status: Pled Guilty & Sentence Imposed / Released on Recognizance --- Information updated
Next Appearance: 01/30/2015 --- Information updated
Part: D
Judge:
Calendar Section: Pending
Arraignment / Hearing Type: No Type
.Disposition/Sentence: Pled Guilty, Conditional Discharge 1 Year, Final Order Of Protection For 5 Years --- Information updated
Docket Sentence: Conditional Discharge 1 Years CVA Fee Imposed $25 DNA Fee Imposed $50 Final Order of Protection 5 Years Surcharge Imposed $175 --- Information updated
Charges:
PL 215.50 03 Crim Contempt-2nd:disobey Crt ** TOP CHARGE**
A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Temp Attorney David R Waldman is back in jail on charges arising from domestic violence:
WALDMAN, DAVID
Booking Information Incarceration 06-MAR-2015
Book & Case Number: 3491502606
Current Housing Facility: MDC (Manhattan Detention Complex)
Arrest Date: 06-MAR-2015
Arrest Number: CRTDRT
Next Court Date: 09-MAR-2015
Bail Status: remanded
DAVID WALDMAN IS DENIED BAIL!!! He's back in the jail for failing to meet court mandates after being convicted of domestic violence charges.
Last Appearance: 03/06/2015 --- Information updated
Part: C --- Information updated
Judge: Scherzer, A --- Information updated
Calendar Section: To Pay Surcharge --- Information updated
Arraignment / Hearing Type: Violation of Conditional Discharge --- Information updated
Court Reporter: Bent, M --- Information updated
Outcome / Release Status: Continued-to Pay Fine/sur/cvaf, Returned On Warrant / Remanded --- Information updated
AVID WALDMAN IS DENIED BAIL!!! He's back in the jail for failing to meet court mandates after being convicted of domestic violence charges.
Last Appearance: 03/06/2015 --- Information updated
Part: C --- Information updated
Judge: Scherzer, A --- Information updated
Calendar Section: To Pay Surcharge --- Information updated
Arraignment / Hearing Type: Violation of Conditional Discharge --- Information updated
Court Reporter: Bent, M --- Information updated
Outcome / Release Status: Continued-to Pay Fine/sur/cvaf, Returned On Warrant / Remanded --- Information updated
You are CRAZY David. I came to this blog from another after googling to see what crazy man would put his first and last name along with another person's name in a crazed manner. After seeing all of those multiple charges?
Crazy!!!!
This post is way too long. And not as funny as your others.
PS - your pal Seth Welty started following my twitter feed several months ago. It was not at all suspicious. I am quite sure he was simply being "inclusive." Speaking of Welty, his public photo is brilliant. The caption is missing though. It would read as follows: "Last known photograph of senor Seth Welty, at large, a former close advisor to Batista and vocal opponent of Fidel and Ramon Castro. Havana, Cuba. 1959.
you really are a narcissistic nut job. you couldn't just come get your things and return my keys. You ghost anyone who hurts you. Instead you deliberately disrespect me and my privacy and enter my apartment when you had 5 days to come get your things. And you keep my keys. After several times threatening my life and wishing me dead.
spiteful. btw, you are welcome. how the heck would i know if you and jeremy kaye had good chemistry? i talked to his friend. what i do know is his touching base after two years means he likes you. You spying on him online on match after two years means you like him. Finding my profile on match means i am looking for someone to like. you said once he would never do anything to hurt you. sounded like the only one of your exes that was a decent guy. no good deed goes unpunished. maybe dont cheat on him this time. you should probably come clean about the STD.
heck, i am thankful you were at least honest with me about cheating and the STD. I respect honesty. Despite your only being so to try to hurt me. And for what? Not wanting to be with a woman who was verbally and physicall abusive, dishonest, hypocritical and as it turned out, narcissistic and borderline sociopathic. and while i never called you a slut like you blogged i did, if you look up the definition of slut and read it vis a vis your behavior, it fits like a glove. 50 men and only 5 boyfriends. Most of whom you cheated on.
Sorry about Vincent. fer reals. made me cry a little. i loved him and i remember one time he blew bubbles when i pet him.
Dude!! She is a new low for you. All this over her? What were you thinking? Since when do you date unattractive, psychotic skanks? Don't do that again.
Ok. Good advice amigo. I only wish you had given sooner. But better late than never. Sorta.
fuck you match.com
This wont be hard to fix. Have jeremy d kaye move out of the apartment he bribed you with, and he can take his clothes, I prefer my wardrobe, and I move in. Then I will "fuck you in each room," like jeremy promised to do since you cheated on him and dumped him years ago for not quite doing it for you. Ooops, wait. I dont think my gf will like that. And I know I wont. And you can add sheets to what you owe me. Bleeding cysts. Soaked with sweat and well...you know. Squirt squirt. Had to retire them to...the garbage!
Sure did. To contempt of court charge for telling statsinger to go fuck himself and for not taking a stalking course. For feeding you content on my blogs you were stalking. Two days in jail over swallowing pride was a no brainer. As was my dumping you for being too easy. A total slut with zero self respect. And who i came to learn is diagnosed NPD. Hence, ur year obsession with hurting me makes sense. As does your efforts to keep me. Even rich Jeremy Kaye is a sad speimen to have to grow old with. Im glad i was the one who sent you to pasture. Did the singles of NYC a huge favor. And gave you a litle going away present..keep an eye on that 'ole cervix. Been thru hell!
I already told you...i went because i told pompous prick statsinger to go fuck himself. No domestic violence. Contempt of court. It was worth it. Even got a handle to give me instant street cred: d-guuci. Y gucci? Because i am cool and got style. Hey, just telling you what i was told. And i nvr called u a slut or whore, u liar. But i did know you were. And u got ugly...what the heck happened to you since i dumped you? db pic on google plus...yikes. srsly...ugly.
but as i was saying, despite this love life replete with the most amazing and passionate and erotic loves of such intensity that they are the stuff that epics and tragedies are made of, you of course go back to jeremy d kaye,
yes. jeremy d kaye represents the pinnacle of this spectacular love life you have led. once you met jeremy, you knew that all of the fairy tale relationships of the past were merely a prelude to...well, to jeremy d kaye!
nice!
this is a good start towards karmic rebate. but just a start. there is a long, long, long way to go sugarbutt.
you went way too far. alluding to domestic violence. pederasty. and the utter disrespect of me to steal my keys and to use them to enter my apartment after being told not to.
these are what got me to where i am.
i could give a shit that you called EMTs to my apartment. i could give less than a third of a fuck that you ghosted me when i broke up with you. or that you told your friends you had broken up with me and i was suicidal over it (and i am so intellectually challenged that i never realized then that you are NPD..textbook!) and blogged it. and i give barely more than 3 or 4 fucks that you successfully got me arrested for harassment for a few emails, only two of which were all that bad. and then, only if the recipient dislikes being called a worthless skank and a cunt. obviously, you are one of those.
but the pederasty. the domestic violence. the disrespect.
heck! sorry, enough about the past. listen, sugarbutt. i feel as though we have been drifting apart lately. you just seem so distant. quiet. i just feel as though we haven't even been intimate in i dont even know how long. i am sure it is just a phase, but i did want to at least mention it.
Post a Comment